While leftists like Rosie O'Donnell rant and rave about the need to ban weapons and remove the 2nd Amendment from our Constitution, and all of the major networks continue to beat that dead horse...i have to suggest that the wrong "right" is to blame for what took place at Virginia Tech on Monday.
Roe v. Wade was decided on Jan. 22, 1973 and made abortion on demand a "right" and has had the greatest influence on the culture of death we now live in. I also think that this "right" to abortion had more to do with the senseless deaths of 32 teachers and students in Blacksburg, VA than the right to bear arms did. The reason is privacy, "the ability of an individual or group to keep their lives and personal affairs out of public view, or to control the flow of information about themselves."
Because of these so called privacy laws that were used to argue in favor of abortion, and have been further defined by HIPAA, the mental issues of Cho Seung-Hui could not be released to those who needed to know about it; such as VT administrators, campus police, et al. Even though he was ruled "mentally ill" according to ABC News, and a counselor even said he"Presents an imminent danger to others as a result of mental illness"; it was a secret that he had a "right" to take to his grave. His so called "right of privacy" that kept his mental issues in a doctor's office file has a trail of blood leading to those two buildings on the campus of Virginia Tech.
So Rosie, ABCNNBCBS News, and all other gun hating but abortion loving leftists...you want to point a finger at a "right" to blame for the Virginia Tech tragedy; look past the 2nd Amendment and then look no further than your precious right to kill unborn babies.
Showing posts with label Bill of Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill of Rights. Show all posts
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
A glimmer of light in the darkness
With the the tragedy at Virginia Tech, increased violence by terrorists in Iraq, and the ever consistent lies and distortions coming from the American left...we can use some good news; and we got it today.
The US Supreme Court, by a 5-4 margin, ruled in favor of a national ban on infanticide...that brutal procedure called partial birth abortion where a baby is partially given birth to before having his or her head crushed by a "doctor of medicine". Ruling for the ban were Chief Justice John Roberts, new Justice Samuel Alito, Constitution Constructionists Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia and then Justice Anthony Kennedy giving the majority opinion. Justice Kennedy said in his opinion, "Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman's right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exemption." Obviously he was looking at this alleged medical procedure from a legal standpoint rather than a moral issue, but the fact still stands that the lives of children are going to be saved as a result of this decision.
Voting against this decision was the usual suspects of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, David Souter, and John Paul Stevens. In her dissent, Justice Ginsburg shows how much she really doesn't get it by saying, "For the first time time since Roe, the court blesses a prohibition with no exception safeguarding a woman's health." Eve Gartner of Planned Parenthood, who by the way is the largest provide of abortions in the US (which means that they have a financial stake in this) said, "This ruling flies in the face of 30 years of Supreme Court precedent and the best interest of women's health and safety. ... This ruling tells women that politicians, not doctors, will make their health care decisions for them."
When will these people ever admit that they are not looking out for a woman's health? I want to see statistics showing how many abortions take place because the mother's life is in danger in comparison to those who just want to end the pregnancy...in other words, birth control.
How about these statistics, single women are 4 times more likely to have abortions than married women. Maybe this one, of the estimated 3 million single women who become pregnant...half of them will seek an abortion. OK, one more...60% of the women who have had abortions since 2000 had previous abortions. And this is all for the mother's "health"?
Isn't ironic that while those who support killing the unborn and violating that right to life that is promised in the Bill of Rights also want to ban the 2nd amendment's right to gun ownership?
Anyway, thank you Supreme Court for giving us a little glimmer of light in the midst of the darkness.
The US Supreme Court, by a 5-4 margin, ruled in favor of a national ban on infanticide...that brutal procedure called partial birth abortion where a baby is partially given birth to before having his or her head crushed by a "doctor of medicine". Ruling for the ban were Chief Justice John Roberts, new Justice Samuel Alito, Constitution Constructionists Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia and then Justice Anthony Kennedy giving the majority opinion. Justice Kennedy said in his opinion, "Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman's right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exemption." Obviously he was looking at this alleged medical procedure from a legal standpoint rather than a moral issue, but the fact still stands that the lives of children are going to be saved as a result of this decision.
Voting against this decision was the usual suspects of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, David Souter, and John Paul Stevens. In her dissent, Justice Ginsburg shows how much she really doesn't get it by saying, "For the first time time since Roe, the court blesses a prohibition with no exception safeguarding a woman's health." Eve Gartner of Planned Parenthood, who by the way is the largest provide of abortions in the US (which means that they have a financial stake in this) said, "This ruling flies in the face of 30 years of Supreme Court precedent and the best interest of women's health and safety. ... This ruling tells women that politicians, not doctors, will make their health care decisions for them."
When will these people ever admit that they are not looking out for a woman's health? I want to see statistics showing how many abortions take place because the mother's life is in danger in comparison to those who just want to end the pregnancy...in other words, birth control.
How about these statistics, single women are 4 times more likely to have abortions than married women. Maybe this one, of the estimated 3 million single women who become pregnant...half of them will seek an abortion. OK, one more...60% of the women who have had abortions since 2000 had previous abortions. And this is all for the mother's "health"?
Isn't ironic that while those who support killing the unborn and violating that right to life that is promised in the Bill of Rights also want to ban the 2nd amendment's right to gun ownership?
Anyway, thank you Supreme Court for giving us a little glimmer of light in the midst of the darkness.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
