Blame Bill Clinton

The libs are have been running around for nearly a month now like chickens with their heads cut off trying to figure out why they lost the 2004 Presidential election. For the life of them, they just can't figure out how their hatred for President Bush, their lies, and their control of big media could not get the French looking John F-Bomb Kerry and his side kick the Breck girl into the White House. You want to point the finger somewhere, i say blame Bill Clinton.

Bill Clinton won the 1992 Presidential Election by less than 7% of the popular vote (By the way, Clinton had only 43% of the vote making him the ONLY President to ever be elected twice without carrying a MAJORITY of the popular vote...that means more people voted against him than for him for those of you living in Broward County, FL), with Ross Perot taking nearly 19% of the popular vote. Basically, Bill Clinton should not have won that election, and probably would have had a pretty good chance of running again and getting elected in 1996 in a race against the probable GOP Nominee Dan Quayle. Which takes me to 2000...

Al Gore had to run with a very big monkey on his back, that being Bill Clinton and his many controversies. If it were not for the early call of FL before half the state was done voting, chances are there would not have been a controversy over who won...Bush would have had a much larger margin (history shows this, Western FL leans Republican), and frustrated voters across the western US who now saw the Presidential race as over may have actually voted instead of going home sulking over "what could have been". No telling HOW many Republicans didn't vote after the networks tried to help Gore steal 2000.

So, with all of this, why do i say "Blame Bill Clinton"? Bill Clinton losing 1992 (like he should have) could have opened the door for him to run again in 1996, or another Democrat "Heavyweight" who would have had a pretty good chance against Quayle (I like Quayle, but he would have never won the White House, sorry). An incumbent in 2000 would have fared much stronger against the upstart George W Bush candidacy, and may have even led to a stronger showing here in 2004 ...where John Kerry could have possibly done much better coming off of a Democrat leaving office.

Liberals and democrats want someone to blame for their losing streak, look no further than your poster-child, Bill Clinton, and i do believe you can find your blame there.

Your humble blogger, Revbeaux